YES—Tacit Knowledge is important. NO—Its tacit nature isn’t what makes it valuable.
Why do we get so excited when discussing tacit knowledge and its significance?
Here are a few reasons:
Knowledge creation always starts with tacit knowledge—so yes, it’s important. 📚
Experts in our organizations possess undocumented, unshared knowledge that is crucial for problem-solving and decision-making. This tacit knowledge is not only important but vital to business performance. 🎯
Tacit knowledge was neglected for many years in KM programs because managing explicit knowledge was easier. This gap elevates the importance of tacit knowledge. 🚀
These are indeed good and important reasons. However:
Not all tacit knowledge is equal. While some represent deep, critical knowledge, other portions may be less significant or even shallow. 🧐
Capturing tacit knowledge and turning it explicit doesn’t diminish its value. Even if some of it remains tacit, successfully codifying 80% of it is a win! 🏆
So, what’s my suggestion?
YES: Aim to handle tacit knowledge by:
Fostering interactions and encouraging experts to share their knowledge. 🤝
Creating new knowledge through various KM activities. 💡
Capturing tacit knowledge and turning it explicit. ✍️
NO:
Don’t treat all tacit knowledge with the same importance—it depends on its depth and specific value. ⚖️
Don’t neglect the knowledge we’ve turned explicit; its value is priceless. 💎
We’re on the right track by embracing tacit knowledge. Let’s take it a step further by being smarter about how we treat both tacit and explicit knowledge. 🚀
Comments